• Takahiro Ito, Tsuneo Imai, Toyone Kikumori, Arihiro Shibata, Takao Horiba, Hironobu Kobayashi, Masataka Sawaki, Reiko Watanabe, Akimasa Nakao, and Tetsuya Kiuchi.
• Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
• Surg. Today. 2006 Jan 1; 36 (11): 961-5.

PurposeTo determine the incidence and importance of functioning tumors among incidentally discovered adrenal masses in the era of laparoscopic surgery.MethodsWe defined adrenal incidentaloma as a tumor detected during abdominal imaging for adrenal-unrelated reasons, and we reviewed 197 consecutive patients with adrenal incidentaloma diagnosed since we started laparoscopic adrenalectomy.ResultsIncidentaloma was discovered initially in 91 (46%) patients and pheochromocytoma was detected as an incidentaloma in 21 (39%) of 54 patients. One patient, a 21-year-old woman taking mesalamine for ulcerative colitis, had a remarkably elevated urinary normetanephrine level, which resulted in the initial misdiagnosis of a 10-cm right adrenal incidentaloma as a pheochromocytoma. Laparoscopic right adrenalectomy resulted in a pathological diagnosis of ganglioneuroma. A series of urinary normetanephrine measurements were taken in parallel with the mesalamine doses. We found that other patients medicated with mesalamine, without adrenal tumors, had elevated urinary normetanephrine levels, confirming that mesalamine metabolites interfere with urinary normetanephrine measurements.ConclusionsIt is essential to diagnose the functional potential of adrenal incidentaloma preoperatively, and not to perform laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal incidentaloma without careful evaluation first.

37 keywords...

hide…