• Claire Roger, Steven C Wallis, Benjamin Louart, Jean-Yves Lefrant, Jeffrey Lipman, Laurent Muller, and Jason A Roberts.
• Service des réanimations, Pôle Anesthésie Réanimation Douleur Urgence, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France Equipe d'Accueil 2992, Faculté de Médecine de Nîmes, Université de Montpellier, Nimes, France Burns, Trauma, and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia claire.roger@chu-nimes.fr.
• J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016 Jun 1; 71 (6): 1643-50.

ObjectivesWhilst commonly performed in ICUs, renal replacement therapies (RRTs) differ in their solute clearances. There is a paucity of data on ciprofloxacin clearances in different RRT techniques. The aim of this study was to compare the population pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin during equal doses of continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVHF) and continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) in septic patients.MethodsPatients receiving 400 mg of ciprofloxacin intravenously 8 or 12 hourly and undergoing either CVVHF or CVVHDF were eligible. Up to 10 blood samples were collected over one dosing interval and analysed by a validated chromatographic method. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulation was undertaken using Pmetrics.ResultsEighteen sampling intervals were included (8 CVVHDF and 10 CVVHF) from 11 patients (6 patients having sampling during both RRT modes). A two-compartment linear model best described the data. Increasing patient weight was the only covariate associated with increasing drug clearance. The mean (SD) parameter estimates were: clearance, 10.7 (5.3) L/h; volume of distribution of the central compartment, 21.3 (11.3) L; rate constant for drug distribution from the central compartment to the peripheral compartment, 10.9 (4.3) L/h; and rate constant for drug distribution from the peripheral compartment to the central compartment, 2.3 (1.8) L/h. After accounting for patient weight, the mean ciprofloxacin clearance was not statistically different between CVVHF and CVVHDF [11.8 (9.9) and 10.3 (7.4) L/h, respectively, P = 0.43].ConclusionsThe present study indicates a high pharmacokinetic variability of ciprofloxacin during CVVHF and CVVHDF with no significant differences in clearance apparent. Based on patient weight, higher ciprofloxacin dosing regimens should be used in critically ill patients when difficult-to-treat pathogens are suspected.© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

49 keywords...

hide…