-
Multicenter Study
Efficacy and safety of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study.
- Toshikazu Tanaka, Shingo Hatakeyama, Kazuyuki Numakura, Koichi Kido, Daisuke Noro, Masaaki Oikawa, Shogo Hosogoe, Noriko Tokui, Hayato Yamamoto, Shintaro Narita, Hiroyuki Ito, Takahiro Yoneyama, Yasuhiro Hashimoto, Toshiaki Kawaguchi, Tomonori Habuchi, and Chikara Ohyama.
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
- Int. J. Urol. 2020 Dec 1; 27 (12): 1095-1100.
ObjectivesTo investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab for patients treated with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 52 metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who were treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab between August 2015 and January 2020. Data on patient characteristics, treatment parameters and adverse events were obtained. Oncological outcomes were assessed according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic model. Furthermore, differences in treatment parameters between patients with objective response (responders) and non-responders were compared.ResultsThe median age and follow-up periods were 69 years and 8.2 months, respectively. The 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 55% and 75%, respectively. The objective response rate was 39%, and it was significantly different between the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium intermediate- and poor-risk groups (52% vs 24%). We observed 36 (69%) any immune-related adverse events, and 19 (37%) severe immune-related adverse events (grades III-V). The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium poor-risk group and higher value of initial C-reactive protein (≥1.0 mg/dL) were significantly associated with non-responders. Patients with two factors (the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium poor-risk group plus C-reactive protein ≥1.0 mg/dL) had a significantly poor overall survival than those with none or a single factor.ConclusionsIn our experience, treatment response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab is comparable with that of the CheckMate 214 clinical trial, but the incidence of treatment-related adverse events is lower. The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium poor-risk group and initial C-reactive protein value might have a prognostic value for poor survival.© 2020 The Japanese Urological Association.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.