• Jaechan Park, Hyunjin Woo, Dong-Hun Kang, Yongsun Kim, and Seung Kug Baik.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea. jparkneurosurgery@gmail.com
• Neurosurgery. 2012 Nov 1;71(5):994-1001; discussion 1002.

BackgroundRecognizing an aneurysmal basal rupture using angiographic evaluation is crucial for optimal treatment.ObjectiveTo evaluate the incidence of a small basal outpouching (the most common angiographic configuration suggesting a basal rupture), the incidence of a ruptured basal outpouching, and the results of surgical and endovascular treatments.MethodsThe occurrence of small basal outpouchings was determined in the initial angiographic examinations of 471 patients with a ruptured aneurysm. Information was also obtained from patient charts, surgical and interventional reports, operative video records, and reviews of radiological investigations.ResultsA small basal outpouching was identified in 41 (8.7%) of the 471 ruptured aneurysms. In the surgical series (n = 286), a basal rupture was identified in 8 (30.8%) of the 26 cases of a basal outpouching and successfully treated by aneurysm clip placement. In the endovascular series (n = 185), intraprocedural aneurysm rebleeding developed in 5 of the 15 patients (33.3%) with a basal outpouching, which was most commonly observed with anterior communicating artery aneurysms.ConclusionThe current surgical series included a 9% incidence of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with a small basal outpouching, and a 31% incidence of these basal outpouchings being identified as the rupture point. The results also suggested that endovascular coiling of a basal outpouching carries a high risk of intraprocedural aneurysm rebleeding, whereas surgical clipping is safer and provides more protection against rebleeding of aneurysms with a basal rupture.

27 keywords...

hide…