• Seth A Seabury, Étienne Gaudette, Dana P Goldman, Amy J Markowitz, Jordan Brooks, Michael A McCrea, David O Okonkwo, Geoffrey T Manley, TRACK-TBI Investigators, Opeolu Adeoye, Neeraj Badjatia, Kim Boase, Yelena Bodien, M Ross Bullock, Randall Chesnut, John D Corrigan, Karen Crawford, Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, Sureyya Dikmen, Ann-Christine Duhaime, Richard Ellenbogen, V Ramana Feeser, Adam Ferguson, Brandon Foreman, Raquel Gardner, Joseph Giacino, Luis Gonzalez, Shankar Gopinath, Rao Gullapalli, J Claude Hemphill, Gillian Hotz, Sonia Jain, Frederick Korley, Joel Kramer, Natalie Kreitzer, Harvey Levin, Chris Lindsell, Joan Machamer, Christopher Madden, Alastair Martin, Thomas McAllister, Randall Merchant, Pratik Mukherjee, Lindsay Nelson, Florence Noel, Eva Palacios, Daniel Perl, Ava Puccio, Miri Rabinowitz, Claudia Robertson, Jonathan Rosand, Angelle Sander, Gabriella Satris, David Schnyer, Mark Sherer, Murray Stein, Sabrina Taylor, Nancy Temkin, Arthur Toga, Alex Valadka, Mary Vassar, Paul Vespa, Kevin Wang, John Yue, Esther Yuh, and Ross Zafonte.
• Department of Ophthalmology and Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
• JAMA Netw Open. 2018 May 18; 1 (1): e180210.

ImportanceMild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) affects millions of Americans each year. Lack of consistent clinical practice raises concern that many patients with mTBI may not receive adequate follow-up care.ObjectiveTo characterize the provision of follow-up care to patients with mTBI during the first 3 months after injury.Design, Setting, And ParticipantsThis cohort study used data on patients with mTBI enrolled in the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) study between February 26, 2014, and August 25, 2016. We examined site-specific variations in follow-up care, the types of clinicians seen by patients receiving follow-up care, and patient and injury characteristics associated with a higher likelihood of receiving follow-up care. The TRACK-TBI study is a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal observational study of patients with TBI presenting to the emergency department of 1 of 11 level I US trauma centers. Study data included patients with head trauma who underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan within 24 hours of injury, had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 to 15, were aged 17 years or older, and completed follow-up care surveys at 2 weeks and 3 months after injury (N = 831).Main Outcomes And MeasuresFollow-up care was defined as hospitals providing TBI educational material at discharge, hospitals calling patients to follow up, and patients seeing a physician or other medical practitioner within 3 months after the injury. Unfavorable outcomes were assessed with the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire.ResultsOf 831 patients (289 [35%] female; 483 [58%] non-Hispanic white; mean [SD] age, 40.3 [16.9] years), less than half self-reported receiving TBI educational material at discharge (353 patients [42%]) or seeing a physician or other health care practitioner within 3 months after injury (367 patients [44%]). Follow-up care varied by study site; adjusting for patient characteristics, the provision of educational material varied from 19% to 72% across sites. Of 236 patients with a positive finding on a CT scan, 92 (39%) had not seen a medical practitioner 3 months after the injury. Adjusting for injury severity and demographics, patient admission to the hospital ward or intensive care unit, patient income, and insurance status were not associated with the probability of seeing a medical practitioner. Among the patients with 3 or more moderate to severe postconcussive symptoms, only 145 of 279 (52%) reported having seen a medical practitioner by 3 months.Conclusions And RelevanceThere are gaps in follow-up care for patients with mTBI after hospital discharge, even those with a positive finding on CT or who continue to experience postconcussive symptoms.

20 keywords...

hide…