-
Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. · Jul 2016
Randomized Controlled TrialA Randomized, Prospective Study of Pediatric Patients With Community-acquired Pneumonia Treated With Ceftaroline Versus Ceftriaxone.
- Christopher R Cannavino, Agnes Nemeth, Bartosz Korczowski, John S Bradley, Tanya O'Neal, Alena Jandourek, H David Friedland, and Sheldon L Kaplan.
- From the *Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of California at San Diego and Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California; †Faculty of Medicine, 2nd Department of Pediatrics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; ‡Medical College, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland; §Department of Clinical Development, Cerexa, Inc., Oakland, California; and; ¶Section of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Feigin Center, Houston, Texas.
- Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2016 Jul 1; 35 (7): 752-9.
BackgroundCommunity-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) remains a major infection among children, despite the use of pneumococcal vaccination. Ceftaroline fosamil is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotic with activity against many bacteria, including Streptococcus pneumoniae (both penicillin-nonsusceptible and multidrug-resistant strains) and Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant S. aureus). This article describes the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of ceftaroline fosamil in the treatment of pediatric patients hospitalized with CABP, from a randomized, active-controlled, observer-blinded clinical study (registration number NCT01530763).MethodsPediatric patients were stratified into 4 age cohorts and randomized (3:1) to receive either intravenous ceftaroline fosamil or ceftriaxone, with optional oral switch for a total treatment duration of 5-14 days. Enrollment was planned for 160 patients. Data collected included demographics, infection characteristics and pathogens. Treatment-emergent adverse events, clinical outcomes, and microbiologic responses were assessed.ResultsCeftaroline fosamil was well tolerated. Similar percentages of patients in the ceftaroline fosamil (55/121; 45%) and ceftriaxone (18/39; 46%) groups reported treatment-emergent adverse events. Coombs seroconversion was observed in 17% of patients in the ceftaroline fosamil group; however, no evidence of hemolytic anemia or hemolysis was found. No deaths were reported during the study. Ceftaroline fosamil had similar effectiveness to ceftriaxone, with high clinical cure rates at test-of-cure in the modified intent-to-treat population (94/107; 88% and 32/36; 89%, respectively). Three documented S. aureus infections were successfully treated in the ceftaroline group, including one caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus.ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that ceftaroline fosamil may be an important treatment option for pediatric patients hospitalized with CABP.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.