• Mathieu Kuchenbuch, Gianluca D'Onofrio, Elaine Wirrell, Yuwu Jiang, Sophie Dupont, Zachary M Grinspan, Stephane Auvin, Jo M Wilmshurst, Alexis Arzimanoglou, J Helen Cross, Nicola Specchio, and Rima Nabbout.
• APHP, Reference Centre for Rare Epilepsies, Department of Pediatric Neurology, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Université de Paris, Paris, France; Laboratory of Translational Research for Neurological Disorders, INSERM UMR 1163, Imagine institute, Université de Paris, France.
• Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Nov 1; 112: 107376.

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to describe epileptologists' opinion on the increased use of remote systems implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic across clinics, education, and scientific meetings activities.MethodsBetween April and May 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional, electronic survey on remote systems use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic through the European reference center for rare and complex epilepsies (EpiCARE) network, the International and the French Leagues Against Epilepsy, and the International and the French Child Neurology Associations. After descriptive statistical analysis, we compared the results of France, China, and Italy.ResultsOne hundred and seventy-two respondents from 35 countries completed the survey. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 63.4% had experienced remote systems for clinical care. During the pandemic, the use of remote clinics, either institutional or personal, significantly increased (p < 10-4). Eighty-three percent used remote systems with video, either institutional (75%) or personal (25%). During the pandemic, 84.6% of respondents involved in academic activities transformed their courses to online teaching. From February to July 2020, few scientific meetings relevant to epileptologists and routinely attended was adapted to virtual meeting (median: 1 [25th-75th percentile: 0-2]). Responders were quite satisfied with remote systems in all three activity domains. Interestingly, before the COVID-19 pandemic, remote systems were significantly more frequently used in China for clinical activity compared with France or Italy. This difference became less marked during the pandemic.ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically altered how academic epileptologists carry out their core missions of clinical care, medical education, and scientific discovery and dissemination. Close attention to the impact of these changes is merited.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

43 keywords...

hide…