• Eun-Young Kim, Jung Hee Yeo, Hyunjeong Park, Kyung Mi Sin, and Cheryl B Jones.
• Dong-A University, Department of Nursing, Busan, South Korea.
• Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Feb 1; 61: 106-111.

BackgroundReality shock is a critical representation of the gap between nursing education and clinical practice and it is important to explore the level of reality shock among nurses. However, there is no relevant instrument to assess the level of reality shock in South Korea.ObjectivesThe purpose of this is to determine the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Environmental Reality Shock-Related Issues and Concerns instrument.DesignA cross-sectional study design was used in this study.SettingsThe data collection was conducted in selected 15 hospitals in South Korea.ParticipantsA convenience sample of 216 newly graduated nurses participated in the study.MethodsThe Korean version of the Environmental Reality Shock-Related Issues and Concerns instrument was developed through the forward-backward translation technique, and revision based on feedback from expert groups. The internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and the construct validity was determined via exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.ResultsThe Korean version of the Environmental Reality Shock-Related Issues and Concerns has reliable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.91). Exploratory factor analysis revealed five factors including job, relationships, expectations, private life, and performance, which explained 61.92% of variance. The factor loadings ranged from 0.451 to 0.832. The five-factor structure was validated by confirmatory factor analysis (RMR<0.05, CFI>0.9).ConclusionIt was concluded that the Korean version of the Environmental Reality Shock-Related Issues and Concerns instrument has satisfactory construct validity and reliability to measure the reality shock of newly graduated nurses in South Korea.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

16 keywords...

hide…