• S R Sharpe, K G Holt, E Saltzman, and R C Wagenaar.
• Salem State College, 352 Lafayette Street, Salem MA 01970, USA. ssharpe@salemstate.edu
• J Biomech. 2008 Jan 1; 41 (5): 968-76.

AbstractThis study examined the transverse plane kinematics of the pelvis, thorax and head while participants walked at a range of speeds on a treadmill under three load conditions: no load, with a loaded backpack with no hip belt and with a loaded backpack with a hip belt. Research has suggested that one mechanism for adapting to heavy loads carried with no hip belt is to reduce the amplitudes and relative phase of transverse plane pelvic and thoracic rotations, in order to minimize rotational torque on the loaded upper body. Transverse plane rotation amplitudes of the pelvis, thorax, backpack and head were calculated from 3D kinematic data for 12 healthy subjects, walking at speeds of 0.5, 0.9, 1.3 and 1.7 ms(-1). Relative phase relation and its variability were also computed for pelvis-thorax rotations and backpack-thorax rotations. Stability of the coordination pattern was estimated as an inverse function of the variability in relative phase. The backpack with the hip belt allowed significantly larger transverse plane rotation amplitudes, along with increased stability of the coordination pattern, than the backpack with no hip belt. Motion patterns of the backpack and thorax suggested that the backpack frame was used to assist with the deceleration and reversal of the loaded thorax, driven by the pelvis through the hip belt connection. Use of the frame in this way may have required less trunk muscle activation and allowed for improved pattern stability.

19 keywords...

hide…