• Pauline McCabe.
• School of Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora 3086, Victoria, Australia. pauline.mccabe@rmit.edu.au
• Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2008 Aug 1; 14 (3): 168-75.

BackgroundQuestions about the risks and regulatory requirements of naturopathy and western herbal medicine (WHM) in Australia prompted research by the Department of Human Services Victoria. This article offers findings from a survey of education providers, which was one of several studies carried out for the report. (The full report can be found at http://www.health.vic.gov.au/pracreg/naturopathy.htm.)MethodQuestionnaires were sent to 43 Australian providers of naturopathy and WHM education.ResultsUnsustainable variation was found in award types, contact hours, clinical education, length of courses, and course content.ConclusionsNaturopaths and WHM practitioners are primary contact health professionals but educational standards vary widely, with some practitioners not likely to be adequately prepared. The degree of risk in their practice, and the need for better integration of complementary care with mainstream healthcare, require education at least to the level of a bachelor degree. Courses should be subject to independent external accreditation. However, attempts to determine appropriate minimum educational standards are unlikely to succeed without the support of a regulatory system that can mandate those minimum requirements.

11 keywords...

hide…