• Kyle M Fargen and William A Friedman.
• Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. Electronic address: Kyle.fargen@neurosurgery.ufl.edu.
• World Neurosurg. 2014 Jul 1; 82 (1-2): e21-9.

AbstractDuring the last 2 decades, there has been a shift in the U.S. health care system towards improving the quality of health care provided by enhancing patient safety and reducing medical errors. Unfortunately, surgical complications, patient harm events, and malpractice claims remain common in the field of neurosurgery. Many of these events are potentially avoidable. There are an increasing number of publications in the medical literature in which authors address cognitive errors in diagnosis and treatment and strategies for reducing such errors, but these are for the most part absent in the neurosurgical literature. The purpose of this article is to highlight the complexities of medical decision making to a neurosurgical audience, with the hope of providing insight into the biases that lead us towards error and strategies to overcome our innate cognitive deficiencies. To accomplish this goal, we review the current literature on medical errors and just culture, explain the dual process theory of cognition, identify common cognitive errors affecting neurosurgeons in practice, review cognitive debiasing strategies, and finally provide simple methods that can be easily assimilated into neurosurgical practice to improve clinical decision making.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

42 keywords...

hide…