• Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis · Aug 2015

    Extra-media thickness and epicardial fat: Comparison of a novel carotid artery ultrasound index and a well-established cardiac magnetic resonance fat quantification method.

    • M Haberka, M Sosnowski, J Zuziak-Pruska, and Z Gąsior.
    • School of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, Department of Cardiology, Katowice, Poland. Electronic address: mhaberka@op.pl.
    • Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Aug 1; 25 (8): 763-70.

    Background And AimEpicardial and pericardial fat are well-established surrogate markers of cardiovascular diseases and complications. Extra-media thickness (EMT) is a novel ultrasound index corresponding to arterial adventitia and adipose tissue. We aimed to evaluate the association between carotid EMT and epicardial fat (EF) and pericardial fat (PF) and their relation to cardiovascular risk and metabolic syndrome (MS).Methods And ResultsOne hundred consecutive patients (age: 51.7 ± 15.4 years; males 70%) scheduled for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) were prospectively included in the study. Anthropometric parameters, CMR indices of EF and PF, both common carotid arteries EMT, and ultrasound indices of visceral and subcutaneous fat were measured in patients. In our study group, 53% of patients represented a very high cardiovascular risk, overweight or obesity was found in 68%, high body fat in 45%, and MS in 59% of individuals. Mean EMT (662 ± 129 μm) was significantly associated with EF area (r = 0.46; p < 0.001) and PF area (r = 0.3; p < 0.001). Among all fat indices, only EMT (MS+ 736 ± 140 μm vs. MS-658 ± 97 μm; p = 0.002) and EF area (MS+ 870 ± 451 mm(2) vs. MS 668 ± 333 mm(2); p = 0.02) were significantly increased in patients with MS compared with individuals without MS. Multivariable regression analysis also showed that mean EMT is independently associated with number of cardiovascular risk factors (b = 0.005; p < 0.001). Moreover, very high cardiovascular risk subjects showed significantly increased EMT/BMI (p < 0.001) and EF area/BMI (p = 0.03) ratios. However, there was no significant association between EMT/BMI and EF area/BMI values (p = ns).ConclusionsOur study showed the first findings on the relations between a novel ultrasound index EMT and EF assessed in a reference method of CMR. Carotid EMT may be a new surrogate marker, including both periarterial fat as a major component and arterial adventitia, which may provide additional data on cardiometabolic risk beyond that derived form a well-established EF alone.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.