• Surgical endoscopy · Jul 2013

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Ten-year outcome after minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial.

    • Jukka Harju, Samuli Aspinen, Petri Juvonen, Hannu Kokki, and Matti Eskelinen.
    • Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, P.O. Box 263, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland. jukka.harju@fimnet.fi
    • Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul 1; 27 (7): 2512-6.

    BackgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) are the two most commonly performed mini-invasive surgical techniques for the treatment of symptomatic gallstone disease, but the long-term outcome after these two procedures has not been compared in prospective clinical trials. We therefore investigated the outcome after LC and MC in 127 patients operated at Kuopio University Hospital.Patients And MethodsInitially 157 patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones were randomised to MC (n = 85) or LC (n = 72) over a 5-year period (1998-2004), and 127 of them (81 %), 69/85 with MC and 58/72 with LC, were reached for a follow-up interview 10.5 (7.3-13.6) years after the surgery.ResultsBaseline and surgical parameters were similar in the two groups; 3/69 MCs and 2/58 LCs were converted to open laparotomy. The prevalence of chronic post-surgical pain 10 years after procedure was similar in the two groups: 5/69 (7 %) in the MC group and 1/58 (2 %) in the LC group (p = 0.14). Residual abdominal symptoms were common, but less frequent in the MC group (14/69; 20 %) than in the LC group (21/58 patients; 36 %) (p = 0.039). In the MC group 63/69 (91 %) and 57/58 (98 %) in the LC group (p = 0.059) were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome.ConclusionOur results suggest a relatively similar long-term outcome after MC and LC.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…