• Farokh R Demehri, Jake Claflin, Mitchell Alameddine, Gurjit Sandhu, Christopher P Magas, Kristen Virgin, and Paul G Gauger.
• Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
• J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov 1; 72 (6): e267-73.

ObjectiveBusy surgical services with diverse team members and frequent handoffs create barriers to patient- and family-centered care. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of cards containing team member names, roles, and photographs-"Surgical Baseball Cards" (SBCs)-would improve patient recognition of caregivers and whether this would improve patient satisfaction.DesignA prospective, controlled study was performed of all adult patients admitted to 2 academic acute care general surgery services with alternating admitting days. Surgical team members on one service had SBCs to give patients at introduction, whereas the control service used no such tool. Before discharge, patients completed a survey consisting of a quiz requiring matching of caregiver photographs to names and roles (5-point maximum), questions rating select elements of patient satisfaction (5-point Likert scale), and an opportunity to provide comments.SettingDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, a university teaching hospital.ParticipantsA total of 162 patients were included over 2 months, with at least a 24-hour admission to an acute care general surgery service.ResultsOverall, 60% of patients in the intervention arm received SBCs. Per-unit SBC cost was 0.16 USD. Patients who received SBCs had significantly improved identification of team members based on name (1.7 ± 1.4 vs 1.2 ± 1.5, p = 0.02) and role (1.6 ± 1.4 vs 0.9 ± 1.2, p = 0.02) than controls did. All the SBC recipients and 88% of controls felt that SBCs should be implemented hospital-wide. SBC recipients reported a trend toward increased comfort with resident involvement in care (4.6 ± 0.7 vs 4.5 ± 0.9, p = 0.14). Among themes discerned from free-response comments, 46% of SBC recipients commented on the innovative nature of SBCs and 29% noted improved team identification. Overall, 17% of SBC recipients commented positively on patient-centered care (vs 3% of controls), whereas 5% commented negatively on patient-centered care (vs 15% of controls); 8% of SBC recipients commented positively on coordination of care (vs 1% of controls), whereas 5% commented negatively on coordination of care (vs 24% of controls).ConclusionsSBCs provide reasonable value by improving patient recognition of healthcare team members and understanding of team member roles, and they are associated with positive patient feedback regarding coordination of care and patient-centered care.Copyright © 2015 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

23 keywords...

hide…