• P A Turan, O Turan, F Güldaval, C Anar, G Polat, and M Büyükşirin.
• Department of Pulmonary Medicine. Menemen State Hospital, Izmir, Turkey(1). Electronic address: onurtura@yahoo.com.
• Respir Med. 2021 Mar 1; 178: 106310.

IntroductionSince GOLD 2017 separates spirometry results from 'ABCD' groups, there have been some changes to the stages of COPD patients. Our aim was to investigate the shifts in COPD groups after GOLD 2017.MethodsCOPD patients from outpatient clinics of 3 hospitals in Turkey were stratified into old and new ABCD groups according to exacerbation history, mMRC evaluation and spirometry results for both GOLD 2011 and 2017 assessments. Treatment protocols were also evaluated if they were suitable for both classifications.ResultsThere were 578 patients (334 men, 244 women) with a mean age of 65.21±10.42. The distribution of patients from group A to D was 28%, 15%, 15%, 42% (GOLD 2011) and 36%, 22%, 7% and 35% (GOLD 2017) respectively. There were shifts from group C to A (53.4%) and D to B (18.4%). The treatment suitability was 66.3% in GOLD 2011 and 60.9% in GOLD 2017. The most common inappropriate treatment protocol was triple therapy. Presence of exacerbations in last year, mMRC score, FEV1 level (p < 0.01 for three parameters) and proportion of males (p = 0.029) were statistically significantly higher in groups C and D of GOLD 2017 compared with new patients in group A and B of GOLD 2017 (shifted from GOLD 2011's C-D groups).ConclusionThere were shifts from group C to A and D to B with GOLD 2017, which means some high-risk COPD patients were reclassified into low-risk groups. Despite guideline updates, there are still many COPD patients with overtreatment. To our knowledge, this is the first study examining transitions between COPD groups after GOLD 2017 in Turkey.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

23 keywords...

hide…