• World Neurosurg · Dec 2014

    Minimally invasive endoscopic resection of intraparenchymal brain tumors.

    • Puneet Plaha, Laurent J Livermore, Natalie Voets, Erlick Pereira, and Simon Cudlip.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Puneet.Plaha@ouh.nhs.uk.
    • World Neurosurg. 2014 Dec 1; 82 (6): 1198-208.

    ObjectiveTo report a minimally invasive, nontubular endoscopic technique to resect intraparenchymal brain tumors and assess the feasibility, safety, and surgical resection margins achievable by this novel technique.MethodsOver a 21-month period, 48 patients underwent 50 consecutive endoscopic intraparenchymal tumor resections. Data on surgical morbidity and mortality and length of stay were collected prospectively. The percentage of surgical resection and residual tumor volumes were calculated using preoperative and postoperative volume computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. All tumors were resected through a 2-cm minicraniotomy using a high-definition rigid endoscope with a 30-degree viewing angle. Bimanual resection was performed using standard microsurgical technique.ResultsMean patient age was 53 years. There were 42 supratentorial (19 frontal, 17 temporal, 3 occipital, 1 parietal, and 2 parafalcine) tumors and 8 infratentorial tumors. Mean tumor volume was 41 cm(3). There were 12 metastases, 24 glioblastomas, 4 World Health Organization grade III gliomas, 5 World Health Organization grade I-II gliomas, 3 meningiomas, and 2 hemangioblastomas. On volumetric analysis, the overall mean percent resection was 96%. In 70% of cases, >95% resection was achieved; total resection was achieved in 48% of cases. At 30 days postoperatively, there was 1 new postoperative neurologic deficit; there were no deaths during this period.ConclusionsOur experience demonstrates that resection of intraparenchymal tumors using a minimally invasive endoscopic technique is technically feasible and safe, achieves good tumor resection margins, and has some potential advantages over a traditional microscopic technique.Crown Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.