-
J Bone Joint Surg Am · Sep 2017
Comparative StudyMagnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastasis: A Matched-Pair Study.
- Hsin-Lun Lee, Chia-Chun Kuo, Jo-Ting Tsai, Chun-You Chen, Meng-Huang Wu, and Jeng-Fong Chiou.
- 1Departments of Radiation Oncology (H.-L.L. and J.-F.C.) and Orthopaedic Surgery (M.-H.W.), Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan 2The Ph.D. Program for Translational Medicine, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University and Academia Sinica, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan 4Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Sep 20; 99 (18): 1572-1578.
BackgroundMagnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is an alternative local therapy for patients with painful bone metastasis for whom standard conventional radiation therapy (RT) has failed. However, the therapeutic effects of MRgFUS as a first-line treatment for bone metastasis remain uncertain.MethodsA matched-pair study was conducted to compare the therapeutic effects of MRgFUS with those of conventional RT as a first-line treatment for patients with painful bone metastasis. The MRgFUS and RT-treated groups were matched 1:2 by age, sex, primary cancer, pretreatment pain score, and treated site.ResultsAccording to the criteria for patient eligibility and matching, 21 and 42 patients (total, 63 patients) with bone metastasis treated with MRgFUS and conventional RT, respectively, were enrolled for analyses. The median ages of the MRgFUS and RT-treated patients were 59 and 61 years, respectively. Among the enrolled patients, 52% were male and 48% were female. The results showed that both MRgFUS and RT were effective. However, MRgFUS was more efficient than RT in terms of the time course of pain palliation as it yielded a significantly higher response rate at 1 week after treatment (71% versus 26%, p = 0.0009).ConclusionsMRgFUS provides a similar overall treatment response rate but faster pain relief compared with conventional RT and has the potential to serve as the first-line treatment for painful bone metastasis in selected patients.Level Of EvidenceTherapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.