-
J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. · Jun 2016
Pharyngeal Flap Is Effective Treatment for Post Maxillary Advancement Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Patients With Repaired Cleft Lip and Palate.
- Kelley M Dentino, Eileen M Marrinan, Katherine Brustowicz, John B Mulliken, and Bonnie L Padwa.
- Clinical Research Fellow, Harvard Medical School, Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
- J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2016 Jun 1; 74 (6): 1207-14.
PurposePatients with repaired cleft lip and cleft palate (CL/P) can develop velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after Le Fort I maxillary advancement. The aim of this study was to evaluate speech outcomes in patients who required a pharyngeal flap after Le Fort I maxillary advancement.Patients And MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included all patients with repaired CL/P who underwent a Le Fort I osteotomy and subsequently required a pharyngeal flap to correct VPI. Patients were included if they had outcome measurements documented at 3 time points: 1) before Le Fort I (baseline), 2) after Le Fort I, and 3) after pharyngeal flap. Outcome measurements, including speech characteristics (resonance, nasal emission, and intraoral pressure) and velopharyngeal function, were evaluated on perceptual assessment by a speech pathologist specializing in cleft care. Velopharyngeal closure was assessed with multi-view videofluoroscopy or nasopharyngoscopy. Patient characteristics and descriptive statistics were summarized and continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Repeated-measures analysis of variance and paired samples t test were used to measure changes in speech outcome variables between time points. All P values were 2-tailed and considered significant for values less than .05.ResultsThere were 23 patients for analysis (13 girls [56.5%] and 10 boys [43.5%]). Two patients (9%) had cleft palate only, 9 (39%) had unilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP), and 12 (52%) had bilateral CLP. Follow-up evaluations performed on average 12 months postoperatively showed statistically meaningful improvement for all variables, including decreased hypernasality, reduced nasal emission, and increased intraoral pressure for consonant production. Patients with repaired CL/P who had VPI after Le Fort I maxillary advancement showed significant improvement in all outcome measurements after pharyngeal flap (P < .001).ConclusionsThe superiorly based pharyngeal flap is highly successful in correcting VPI after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in patients with repaired CL/P.Copyright © 2016 The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.