• Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao · Oct 2013

    [Quantitative ultrasound scans of the calcaneus: a useful tool for screening osteoporosis in patients with connective tissue disease].

    • Yu Wang, Wei Zhou, Yan-Jie Hao, Guang-Tao Li, Xue-Rong Deng, Juan Zhao, and Zhuo-Li Zhang.
    • Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
    • Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao. 2013 Oct 18; 45 (5): 766-9.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the ability of calcaneus quantitative ultrasound (QUS) to diagnose osteoporosis in connective tissue disease (CTD) patients.MethodsIn the study, 126 female patients with established CTD underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumber and right hip and QUS of the right heel at the same time. Sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values were calculated to determine the correlation between cases of osteoporosis detected by the QUS heel scan and by DXA.ResultsThe mean age of the 126 patients was (43.4 ± 19.8) years (ranging from 30.0 to 80.0 years). Based on their DXA data, 36 (28.6%) patients had normal bone mineral density (BMD, T score ≥ -1.0), 90 (71.4%) patients had abnormal BMD. In abnormal BMD patients, 45 (35.7%) had osteopenia (-2.5 < T score<-1.0), and 42 (33.3%) were osteoporotic (T score ≤ -2.5), while 3 (2.4%) patients had fragile fracture. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS) and stiffness index (SI) were all significantly different between osteopenia and the normal group when scanning with QUS. QUS T score was positively correlated with DXA T score, both at lumber and right hip respectively (r=0.491, 0.648, P<0.01). After correction by age and BMI, QUS T score remained positively correlated with DXA T score by partial correlation analysis (Pearson partial vertebral r=0.430, P=0.006; right hip r=0.593, P<0.001). The area under the ROC curve for diagnosis of lumber and hip osteoporosis were 0.836 (95%CI: 0.695, 0.977) and 0.647 (95%CI: 0.579, 0.957) separately. The sensitivity and specificity for identifying osteoporosis in lumber were 70% and 83.3% respectively when the T score threshold of QUS was defined as -1.5; however, the sensitivity and the specificity for identifying osteoporosis at right hip were 72.7% and 88.9% when T score threshold of QUS was defined as -1.85. The best SI threshold was defined as 76 for identifying osteoporosis, with sensitivity being 0.800 and specificity 0.741.ConclusionOur study confirmed that QUS measurements performed at calcaneus with quantitative ultrasound bone analysis were capable of screening osteoporosis defined by axial BMD using DXA in female CTD patients.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.