• Shengyi Lu, Lene Baad-Hansen, Zhenting Zhang, and Peter Svensson.
• Department of Oral Implantology, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100050, PR China. eflsy@hotmail.com
• Arch. Oral Biol. 2013 Oct 1; 58 (10): 1483-90.

UnlabelledTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to assess corticomotor control of jaw muscles, but few studies have examined cortical plasticity of the masticatory system and potential modification by jaw muscle training.ObjectivesTo determine if a 1-h jaw muscle training task would be sufficient to induce signs of neuroplastic changes in the corticomotor excitability of the masseter muscle.Materials And MethodsCorticomotor excitability was assessed by changes in electromyographic activity evoked by TMS in 15 healthy participants. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded in the masseter and the first dorsal interosseos (FDI - as a control) muscle were assessed at four time points: at baseline, immediately after the 1-h training, 1h after training and 1 day follow-up (n=7). MEPs were assessed by stimulus-response curves and corticomotor mapping.ResultsAll participants successfully performed the task (mean success rate: 47.0±4.1%) which increased significantly during the 1-h training. However, no significant effect of jaw muscle training on masseter and FDI MEPs or corticomotor maps were observed.ConclusionThe present finding showed that 1-h jaw muscle training is insufficient to evoke neuroplastic changes in corticomotor excitability. The potential for training-induced neuroplasticity may vary among different cranial muscles which may have therapeutic consequences.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

22 keywords...

hide…