• J Clin Rheumatol · Aug 2011

    Defining high risk of osteoporotic fracture: a cross talk between clinical experience and guidelines recommendations.

    • Enrique Casado, Jorge Malouf, Manuel M Caamaño, Esteban Salas, Juan M Sánchez-Bursón, María L Rentero, and Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont.
    • Department of Rheumatology, Hospital de Sabadell, Corporació Sanitària i Universitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona. ecasado@tauli.cat
    • J Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Aug 1; 17 (5 Suppl 3): S59-66.

    Background: There is no universally accepted definition for patients at high risk of osteoporotic fracture.Objectives: This study aimed to survey Spanish rheumatologists; to obtain opinions about risk factors, and an acceptable definition for patients at high risk of osteoporotic fracture; and to compare daily practice patterns with current osteoporosis guidelines.Methods: A total of 174 rheumatologists from throughout Spain completed an online survey about various risk factors for fragility fracture and about the management of patients with osteoporosis in clinical practice. Results were reviewed by a coordinating committee of osteoporosis experts and were compared with published national and international guideline recommendations.Results: Almost all rheumatologists who completed the survey (99%) consider that a group of patients exists with a high risk of osteoporotic fracture and that this group should be managed appropriately. Previous fracture is considered the most important risk factor, particularly in cases of multiple fracture, severe vertebral fracture, hip fracture, or fracture despite osteoporosis treatment. However, in osteoporosis guidelines, age, bone mineral density, and previous fragility fracture are the most important risk factors for new fracture. Furthermore, Spanish rheumatologists tend to treat patients at high risk of fracture with anabolic therapy (e.g., teriparatide), whereas guidelines make no such recommendation.Conclusions: In osteoporosis, a large gap exists between implementation of guideline recommendations and actual clinical practice; this may be due, in part, to heterogeneity among existing guidelines. Thus, inclusion in guidelines of a practical definition of high risk of osteoporotic fracture may provide significant opportunities to improve patient care and prevent future fragility fractures.Key Points:

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…