• Thomas J Kibsgård, Olav Røise, Einar Sudmann, and Britt Stuge.
• Department of Orthopaedics, Oslo University Hospital, P.B. 4950, 0424 Oslo, Norway. kibsgard@gmail.com
• Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr 1; 22 (4): 871-7.

PurposeFusion of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) has been a treatment option for patients with severe pelvic girdle pain (PGP). The primary aims were to evaluate the long-term outcomes in patients who underwent SIJ fusion and to compare 1-year outcomes with long-term outcomes. The secondary aim was to compare patients who underwent SIJ fusion with a comparable group who did not.MethodsThis study includes fifty patients that underwent SIJ fusion between 1977 and 1998. Function (the Oswestry disability index; ODI), pain intensity (visual analogue scale; VAS) and health-related quality of life (SF-36) were determined according to a patient-reported questionnaire. The questionnaire scores were compared with previously recorded 1-year outcomes and with questionnaire scores from a group of 28 patients who did not undergo SIJ fusion.ResultsThe patients who underwent SIJ fusion reported a mean ODI of 33 (95 % CI 24-42) and a mean VAS score of 54 (95 % CI 46-63) 23 years (range 19-34) after surgery. Regarding quality of life, the patients reported reduced physical function, but mental health was not affected in the same manner. The patients with successful 1-year outcomes (48 %) retained significantly improved function and reduced pain levels compared with the subgroup of patients with unsuccessful 1-year outcomes (28 %). The patients who underwent surgery did not differ from the non-surgery group in any outcome at the long-term follow-up.ConclusionsPatients treated with SIJ fusion had moderate disability and pain 23 years after surgery, and the 1-year outcomes were sustained 23 years after surgery. Although many fused patients reported good outcome, this group did not differ from the comparable non-surgical group.

19 keywords...

hide…