• Ilhan Alcelik, Zubair M Saeed, Ben A Haughton, Rizwan Shahid, John C Alcelik, Craig Brogden, and Adam Budgen.
• Department of Orthopaedics, York Hospital, Wigginton Road, York YO31 8HE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: ialcelik67@gmail.com.
• Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Oct 1; 24 (5): 427-434.

BackgroundOpen Achilles tendon repairs (OATR) are associated with high complication rates. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques like the Achillon Achilles tendon repair (AATR) were developed to reduce this. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare OATR with AATR.MethodsWe performed an extensive literature search including all studies that compared the two techniques. Outcomes assessed included overall complication rate, re-rupture rate, sural nerve injury, wound length, The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Scores (AOFAS) scores and return to sports.ResultsEight studies were suitable for inclusion totalling 210 patients in the AATR group vs 233 patients in the OATR group. Total complication rates were significantly reduced in the Achillon patients with odd ratio of 0.14 (CI 95%, 0.08-0.27, P<0.00001) in favour. There were no significant differences in re-rupture rate, sural nerve injury, return to sports and AOFAS scores following repair between the two groups.ConclusionsAATR has fewer overall complications compared with OATR. It should be considered as an alternative to open surgical repair.Copyright © 2017 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

23 keywords...

hide…