-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Dec 1978
Comparative StudyNon--cloth-covered caged-ball prostheses. The second decade.
- Q Macmanus, G L Grunkemeier, L E Lambert, and A Starr.
- J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1978 Dec 1; 76 (6): 788-94.
AbstractThe Starr-Edwards Models 6120 mitral and 1200/60 aortic valves are caged-ball prostheses with cloth-covered sewing rings and bare-metal struts. Introduced in 1965, they have been in continuous clinical use longer than any other currently available heart valve prostheses. Late results with this valve are analyzed and compared with recent series employing other current valve prostheses. One hundred thirty-four mitral 6120 prostheses were inserted at the University of Oregon Health Sciences Center from 1965 through 1977, with 118 operative survivors followed for a mean of 5.4 years. Twelve-year survival rate (+/- standard error) was 50 (+/-8) percent. Twelve percent of late deaths were valve related. Eighty-eight (+/-5) percent of valves were still in place at 12 years. The embolic rate was 5.8 (+/-1.0) percent per patient-year for all emboli and 2.2(+/-0.6) percent per patient-year for serious emboli. Two hundred forty-nine operative survivors among 282 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement during the same period of time were followed for a mean of 4.3 years. Twelve-year survival was 61 (+/-6) percent and the removal-free rate was 92(+/-5) percent. Six percent of late deaths were valve related. Embolic rates were 5.0 (+/-.7) percent and 1.8 (+/-.4) percent per patient-year for all emboli and serius emboli, respectively. Structural failure, specifically ball variance, was not encountered with this prosthesis. Ninety percent of 10 year survivors are in N.Y.H.A. Functional Class I or II. There was one anticoagulant-related death in 1,698 patient-years of follow-up. The current non--cloth-covered caged-ball valves provide unquestionable durability and well-documented results into their second decade of use. They provide a base line for comparison with newer prostheses and offer a valid, current choice for both aortic and mitral valve replacement.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.