• Hidekazu Takahashi, Makoto Yamasaki, Masashi Hirota, Yasuaki Miyazaki, Jeong Ho Moon, Yoshihito Souma, Masaki Mori, Yuichiro Doki, and Kiyokazu Nakajima.
• Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2-E2, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. htakahashi@gesurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp
• Surg Endosc. 2013 Aug 1; 27 (8): 2980-7.

BackgroundAlthough its theoretical usefulness has been reported, the true value of automatic smoke evacuation system in laparoscopic surgery remains unknown. This is mainly due to the lack of objective evaluation. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of the automatic smoke evacuator in laparoscopic surgery, by real-time objective evaluation system using an industrial smoke-detection device.MethodsSix pigs were used in this study. Three surgical ports were placed and electrosurgical smoke was generated in a standard fashion, using either a high-frequency electrosurgical unit (HF-ESU) or laparosonic coagulating shears (LCS). The smoke was evacuated immediately in the evacuation group but not in the control nonevacuation group. The laparoscopic field-of-view was subjectively evaluated by ten independent surgeons. The composition of the surgical smoke was analyzed by mass spectrometry. The residual smoke in the abdominal cavity was aspirated manually into a smoke tester, and stains on a filter paper were image captured, digitized, and semiquantified.ResultsSubjective evaluation indicated superior field-of-view in the evacuation group, compared with the control, at 15 s after activation of the HF-ESU (P < 0.05). The smoke comprised various chemical compounds, including known carcinogens. The estimated volume of intra-abdominal residual smoke after activation of HF-ESU was significantly lower in the evacuation group (47.4 ± 16.6) than the control (76.7 ± 2.4, P = 0.0018). Only marginal amount of surgical smoke was detected in both groups after LCS when the tissue pad was free from burnt tissue deposits. However, the amount was significantly lower in the evacuation group (21.3 ± 10.7) than the control (75 ± 39.9, P = 0.044) when the tissue pad contained tissue sludge.ConclusionsAutomatic smoke evacuation provides better field-of-view and reduces the risk of exposure to harmful compounds.

12 keywords...

hide…