• Clinical nutrition ESPEN · Dec 2017

    Observational Study

    Elderly Nutritional Indicators for Geriatric Malnutrition Assessment (ENIGMA): Development and validation of a nutritional prognostic index.

    • Tze Pin Ng, Nyunt Ma Shwe Zin MSZ Gerontology Research Programme, Department of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore., Qi Gao, Shiou Liang Wee, Philip Yap, and Keng Bee Yap.
    • Gerontology Research Programme, Department of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Alexandra Health Services, Singapore. Electronic address: pcmngtp@nus.edu.sg.
    • Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2017 Dec 1; 22: 54-63.

    BackgroundFew nutritional measurement tools have been validated that predict long-term mortality risks in community-living older persons.ObjectiveTo develop and validate a new nutritional prognostic index (ENIGMA) for use in geriatric outpatient or primary care.DesignWe developed the ENIGMA (four questions: unable to shop, cook or feed one's self, difficulty eating due to oral problem, eat few fruits or vegetables, 3 or more drugs a day, and four blood indicators: low albumin, hemoglobin, total cholesterol and lymphocyte count), and evaluated its predictive validity for 10 years mortality outcome in a development cohort (N = 1550) of community-living older persons, in comparison with the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and ESPEN Malnutrition (ESPEN-M), and calibrated it externally in a validation cohort (N = 924).ResultsIn the development cohort, ENIGMA component indicators and summary risk score (0-10) were independently associated with significantly increased mortality hazard ratio (HR), adjusted for age, sex, chronic diseases, comorbidity and inflammatory status. Increasing risk categories predicted increasing adjusted HRs (95% CI); low (0-1): reference, moderate (2-3): 1.48 (1.10-2.00), high (4-5): 2.32 (1.52-3.55), very high (6+): 4.97 (2.52-9.77). ENIGMA showed better discriminatory accuracy (C = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.63-0.71) than MNA (C = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.55-0.63), GNRI (C = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.52-0.61), and ESPEN-M (C = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.48-0.56). The predictive accuracy and utility of ENIGMA was supported in the validation cohort (C = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.62-0.74); calibration-at-large, a = 0.00007, p = 0.187; calibration slope = 0.997, 95% CI, 0.997-0.998).ConclusionThe ENIGMA is a validated nutritional prognostic tool that strongly predicts long-term mortality risks and is recommended for use in geriatric outpatient and primary care settings.Copyright © 2017 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…