• W L Tsai, J S Cheng, K H Lai, C P Lin, G H Lo, P I Hsu, H C Yu, C K Lin, H H Chan, W C Chen, T A Chen, W L Li, and H L Liang.
• Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
• Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008 Aug 1; 28 (3): 304-11.

BackgroundThe long-term outcome of percutaneous acetic acid injection (PAI) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) for treating small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear.AimTo compare the long-term outcome of PAI vs. PEI for treating small HCC.MethodsFrom July 1998 to July 2004, 125 patients with small HCC were enrolled. Seventy patients receiving PAI and 55 patients receiving PEI were enrolled. There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics between the two groups. Tumour recurrence and survival rates were assessed.ResultsMean follow-up time was 43 months. The local recurrence rate and new tumour recurrence rate were similar between the PAI and PEI groups. The PAI group had significantly better survival than the PEI group (P = 0.027). Multivariate analysis revealed that PAI was the significant factor associated with overall survival [PAI vs. PEI, RR: 0.639, 95% CI: (0.419-1.975), P = 0.038]. The treatment sessions required to achieve complete tumour necrosis were significantly fewer in the PAI group than in the PEI group (2.4 +/- 1.0 vs. 2.9 +/- 1.3, P = 0.018).ConclusionPercutaneous acetic acid injection required fewer treatment sessions than PEI and provided better survival after long-term follow-up.

29 keywords...

hide…