• Zhonghua yi xue za zhi · Jun 2016

    Comparative Study

    [A comparation of efficacy between unilateral laminectomy approach bilateral decompression and traditional total laminectomy decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis].

    • W Hu, J Zhao, C Gong, M Zou, J H Yuan, and X Y Liu.
    • Department of Spinal Surgery, Bozhou People's Hospital, Anhui 236803, China.
    • Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Jun 7; 96 (21): 1673-6.

    ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy between unilateral laminectomy approach bilateral decompression and traditional total laminectomy decompression in the treatment of graft bone fusion and internal fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with the unilateral symptoms.MethodFrom January 2013 to December 2014, a total of 40 patients with unilateral symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis were treated in Department of Spinal Surgery Bozhou People's Hospital of Anhui Province. Twenty patients(group A ) were treated by severe symptoms unilateral facetectomy and resection of superior articular and laminectomy and lateral recess decompression, interbody fusion, pedicle screw fixation.Twenty patients(group B ) were treated by total laminectomy interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation.The time of operation, blood loss of the two groups were recorded.At the same time the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index(ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores(JOA) before and after operation (3, 6 , 12months) were recorded retrospectively. The effect of surgery were evaluated and compared.ResultThe VAS, JOA, and ODI of group A preoperation is respectively have no significant differences with the group B (P>0.05). The operation time, blood loss in operation of group A was respectively(133.2±25.3) min, (415.0±42.1) ml, significant differences with the group B[(491.0±46.3)ml; (156.2±28.5) min, P<0.05)]. The VAS, JOA, ODI of group A had no significant differences with the group B (P>0.05) at 3, 6 months after operation.The VAS, JOA, ODI of group A was respectively (3.0±0.6), (25.3±5.1), (16.5±1.5)scores, had significant differences with the group B and preoperation (P<0.05) at 12 months after operation. The radiographic data showed that the interbody fusion rate of group A was 100%, and group B was 95%, had significant differences by statistical analysis (P<0.05) at 12 months afer operation.ConclusionThe improved unilateral laminectomy approach and bilateral decompression have less operation time and blood loss, more satisfactory for the lumbar spinal stenosis patients with the unilateral severe symptoms, the other side moderate stenosis and mild symptoms.The efficacy of lumbar stability and bilateral decompression is better by operation of improved unilateral approach.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.