• J Rheumatol · Aug 2019

    Improving Benefit-harm Assessment of Therapies from the Patient Perspective: OMERACT Premeeting Toward Consensus on Core Sets for Randomized Controlled Trials.

    • Kathleen M Andersen, Jonathan T L Cheah, Lyn March, Susan J Bartlett, Dorcas Beaton, Clifton O Bingham, Peter M Brooks, Robin Christensen, Philip G Conaghan, Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino, Maarten de Wit, Amylou C Dueck, Susan M Goodman, Shawna Grosskleg, Catherine L Hill, Martin Howell, Sarah L Mackie, Bethan Richards, Beverly Shea, Jasvinder A Singh, Vibeke Strand, Peter Tugwell, George A Wells, and Lee S Simon.
    • From the Department of Family Medicine, and Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Institute for Work & Health, Toronto; OMERACT; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, and School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa Cardiovascular Research Methods Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen; Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical School, New York, New York; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Division of Biostatistics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona; Medicine Service, VA Medical Center; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California; SDG LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Sydney Medical School, and Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney; Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District; Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Road, St Leonards; Centre for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide; Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville; Department of Rheumatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia; Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds; UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust; NIHR-Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Rheumatology Department, Boulogne-Billancourt; INSERM U1173, Laboratoire d'Excellence INFLAMEX, UFR Simone Veil, Versailles-Saint-Quentin University, Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, France; Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Department of Medical Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. kathleen.andersen@mail.mcgill.ca.
    • J Rheumatol. 2019 Aug 1; 46 (8): 1053-1058.

    ObjectiveOutcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) convened a premeeting in 2018 to bring together patients, regulators, researchers, clinicians, and consumers to build upon previous OMERACT drug safety work, with patients fully engaged throughout all phases.MethodsDay 1 included a brief introduction to the history of OMERACT and methodology, and an overview of current efforts within and outside OMERACT to identify patient-reported medication safety concerns. On Day 2, two working groups presented results; after each, breakout groups were assembled to discuss findings.ResultsFive themes pertaining to drug safety measurement emerged.ConclusionCurrent approaches have failed to include data from the patient's perspective. A better understanding of how individuals with rheumatic diseases view potential benefits and harms of therapies is essential.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.