• Steven T Peper, Adam C Jones, Cynthia Reinoso Webb, Mark Lacy, and Steven M Presley.
• From the Departments of Environmental Toxicology and Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, and the Department of Human Development, Family Studies, and Counseling, Texas Woman's University, Denton.
• South. Med. J. 2021 May 1; 114 (5): 277282277-282.

ObjectiveRecognition and reporting of vector-borne and zoonotic disease (VBZD) cases is largely dependent upon the consideration of such diseases by healthcare practitioners during the initial diagnosis and ordering of specific confirmative diagnostic tests. This study was conducted to assess the general knowledge and understanding of VBZD transmission and clinical presentation.MethodsHealthcare practitioners were surveyed to determine the extent of training and educational experiences they received relative to VBZDs, and their likelihood to consider such diseases during differential diagnoses. In addition, an assessment of their knowledge of arthropod species that may transmit VBZD pathogens was conducted.ResultsHaving postprofessional school training relevant to VBZDs significantly influenced diagnostic accuracy for such disease cases based on the presented clinical signs and symptoms.ConclusionsThe prevalence of VBZDs in the United States likely is significantly underestimated. The authors suggest the enhancement of VBZD-focused education as an important initiative that would significantly improve timely diagnosis, treatment, and, ultimately, prevention of these diseases.

12 keywords...

hide…