• Andrew S Little, Peter Nakaji, and John Milligan.
• Barrow Neurological Institute, Division of Neurological Surgery, St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Electronic address: andrew.little@bnaneuro.net.
• World Neurosurg. 2013 Nov 1;80(5):583-90.

BackgroundThe nasolacrimal duct resides in the wall of the medial nasal cavity and influences minimal access endoscopic transmaxillary approaches to the lateral skull base. We describe an algorithm for surgical approach selection on the basis of the relationship of the target lesion to a line drawn from the anterior nasal SEptum through the Nasolacrimal Duct to the lesion (i.e., SEND line).MethodsWe use the SEND line to estimate the lateral extent in the endonasal middle meatal transmaxillary approach, where the surgeon has good surgical freedom without the use of angled instruments and endoscopes. Lesions with an epicenter lateral to the SEND line were addressed through a sublabial anterior antrostomy transmaxillary corridor. Tumors with a more medially located epicenter, such as those involving the lateral sphenoid sinus and pterygoid plates, were addressed through the endonasal middle meatal corridor. Extensive tumors involving both domains were addressed through a combination approach.ResultsWe describe three instructive cases in which the approach selection was determined in part by preoperative assessment of the location of the tumor relative to the SEND line.ConclusionsThe endoscopic sublabial transmaxillary and endoscopic endonasal middle meatal transmaxillary approaches are complementary corridors to the anterior skull base that can be used independently or in combination. The location of the target lesion relative to the SEND line as determined on preoperative imaging can serve as a guide for surgical decision making.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

40 keywords...

hide…