• Hengqing Gao, Xiaohong Cheng, Runping Liu, Xiaoqiang Wang, Wei Wang, Furao Gong, Renping Pan, and Jing Hu.
• Department of Anorectal.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 7; 100 (18): e25661e25661.

AbstractTo study the clinical effects of Diding Oral Medicine as an alternative to preventative antibiotics in perioperative hemorrhoids.From August 2017 to February 2018, a total of 214 patients who were treated with external exfoliation and internal ligation of mixed hemorrhoids in our hospital were divided into the control group and experimental group by way of stratified random (107 cases in each group). Patients in the control group were given antibiotics preventatively before operation, while patients in the experimental group took Diding Oral Medicine before operation, and the white blood cell count, neutrophil count, wound recovery, pain score, anal bulge score, and pathogen culture of wound secretions were compared between the 2 groups.There was no significant difference in white blood cell count and neutrophil count between both groups before and after operation (P > .05). The wound seepage score, wound edema score, and wound area score in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, and the wound healing in the experimental group was shorter than that in the control group (all P < .05). The pain score and anal bulge score of the experimental group were decreased significantly compared to the control group (P < .05). In addition, the detection rate of pathogenic bacteria in the experimental group was downregulated significantly compared to the control group (P < .05).The Diding Oral Medicine has prominent bacteriostatic and antibacterial effects on patients with hemorrhoids during perioperative period, and promotes wound healing, reduces pain stress, and anal bulge.Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

36 keywords...

hide…