• Elvira R Flikweert, Klaus W Wendt, Ronald L Diercks, Gerbrand J Izaks, Roy Stewart, Martin Stevens, and ReiningaInge H FIHFDepartment of Surgery-Traumatology University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 300019700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands..
• Department of Surgery-Traumatology University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 300019700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: e.r.flikweert@umcg.nl.
• Injury. 2021 Jul 1; 52 (7): 1819-1825.

IntroductionHip fracture surgery is among the most performed surgical procedures in elderly patients. Mortality rates are high, however, and patients often fail to live independently following a hip fracture. To improve outcome, multidisciplinary care pathways have been initiated, but longer-term results are lacking. Aim of this study was to compare functional outcome and living situation six months after hip fracture treatment with and without a care pathway.Patients And MethodsA multicentre prospective controlled trial was conducted with three hospitals: in one hospital patients were treated with a care pathway, in the other hospitals patients received usual care. All patients aged ≥ 60 years with a hip fracture were asked to participate. Besides basic characteristics, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) and performance scores of activities of daily living (Katz Index and Lawton IADL) were assessed. Differences in scores were analysed using linear regression. Propensity score adjustment was used to correct for differences between the care pathway and the usual care group. Missing data were imputed.ResultsNo differences in rate of return to prefracture ADL level were found between patients in the care pathway group and the usual care group. The percentage of participants in the same situation as before the fracture was the same in both treatment groups (81%). There were no significant differences in quality of life, activities of daily living or mortality (15% vs 10%, p = 0.17), but hospital stay in the care pathway group was significantly shorter (median 7 vs 10 days).DiscussionTreatment of elderly patients with a hip fracture is commonly organised in care pathways. Although short-term advantages are reported, positive effects on longer-term functional results could not be proven in our study. This study confirmed a shorter hospital stay in the care pathway group, which potentially may lead to a reduction in costs.ConclusionsFunctional outcome and living situation six months after a hip fracture is the same for patients treated with or without a care pathway.Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

12 keywords...

hide…