• Wei-Cheng Tseng, Wei-Lin Lin, and Chen-Hwan Cherng.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar 1; 98 (10): e14832.

AbstractThe nasopharyngeal airway is an important equipment in airway management, a correct placement is crucial for its effectiveness. We measured the nares-to-epiglottis distance (NED) and examined the correlations of the optimal insertion length (NED-1) with patient characteristics and various external facial measurements. We aimed to develop a simple method for estimating the optimal insertion length and to help select an appropriate nasopharyngeal airway.Two hundred patients of ASA grade I & II aged >20 years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. We measured nares-to-ear tragus distance (NTD), nares-to-mandibular angle distance (NMD), philtrum-to-ear tragus distance (PTD), and philtrum-to-mandibular angle distance (PMD). The NED was measured by fiber-optic bronchoscope. All measurements were obtained in centimeters. NED-1 (cm) was defined as the optimal insertion length. The patient's sex, age, body weight, body height, and body mass index were recorded.The NED-1 significantly correlated with body weight, body height, NTD, NMD, PTD, and PMD. Backward stepwise multiple linear regression analysis yielded the formula for predicting NED-1: 0.331 - 0.018 × BW + 0.061 × BH + 1.080 × NMD - 1.256 × PMD + 0.697 × PTD (r = 0.640, P < .001). The regression lines of the optimal insertion length versus PTD showed the best fit to the equality line. The measurements of PTD showed the minimal differences from NED-1 and with the most patients showing <1 cm differences from NED-1.The optimal insertion depth of nasopharyngeal airway can easily be predicted by the distance from philtrum-to-ear tragus, and a nasopharyngeal airway of an appropriate size can be selected accordingly.

27 keywords...

hide…