• World Neurosurg · Jul 2021

    Review

    Complementary and Alternative Medicine for the Treatment of Gliomas: Scoping Review of Clinical Studies, Patient Outcomes, and Toxicity Profiles.

    • Dhiraj J Pangal, Hans Baertsch, Eliza M Kellman, Tyler Cardinal, Andrew Brunswick, Martin Rutkowski, Ben Strickland, Frances Chow, Frank Attenello, and Gabriel Zada.
    • USC Brain Tumor Center, USC Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. Electronic address: pangal@usc.edu.
    • World Neurosurg. 2021 Jul 1; 151: e682-e692.

    IntroductionComplementary and alternative medicine (CAM) are highly used among those diagnosed with glioma. Further research is warranted, however, as it remains important to clearly delineate CAM practices that are unproven, disproven, or promising for future research and implementation.MethodsA systematic review was conducted to identify all articles that investigated the effect of any CAM therapy on survival of patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent glioma.ResultsEighteen papers and 4 abstracts pertaining to the effects of ketogenic diet (4), antioxidants (3), hyperbaric oxygen (4), cannabinoids (2), carbogen and nicotinamide (3), mistletoe extract (2), hypocupremia and penicillamine (1), and overall CAM use (3) on overall and progression-free survival in patients with low- and high-grade glioma were identified (Levels of Evidence I-IV). Ketogenic diets, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and cannabinoids appear to be safe and well tolerated by patients; preliminary studies demonstrate tumor response and increased progression-free survival and overall survival when combined with standard of care therapies. Antioxidant usage exhibit mixed results perhaps associated with glioma grade with greater effect on low-grade gliomas; vitamin D intake was associated with prolonged survival. Conversely, carbogen breathing and hypocupremia were found to have no effect on the survival of patients with glioma, with associated significant toxicity. Most modalities under the CAM umbrella have not been appropriately studied and require further investigation.ConclusionsDespite widespread use, Level I or II evidence for CAM for the treatment of glioma is lacking, representing future research directions to optimally counsel and treat glioma patients.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.