• Aneka Mueller, Marlies Wagner, Elke Hattingen, Alexander Seiler, Se-Jong You, Patrick Samp, and Oliver C Singer.
• From the Department of Neurology (A.M., A.S., O.C.S.), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Germany.
• Stroke. 2019 Nov 1; 50 (11): 3274-3276.

AbstractBackground and Purpose- Patients with large-vessel stroke frequently need to be transferred to comprehensive stroke centers for endovascular treatment. An update of physiological perfusion parameters and stroke progression on arrival is desirable. We examined the reliability of preinterventional pooled blood volume (PBV)-maps acquired by flat-panel detector computed tomography (CT) in the interventional angiography suite. Methods- The volumes of preinterventional perfusion deficit in flat-panel detector CT-PBV source images were compared with final infarct volume on follow-up multislice-CT after endovascular treatment of 29 consecutive patients with occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) or the distal internal carotid artery (ICA). Results- Endovascular treatment was successful in 26 patients (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction, 2b-3). Overall, the median preinterventional PBV-deficit was 9×larger than median final infarct volume on multislice-CT (86.4 mL [10.3; 111.6] versus 9.6 mL [3.6; 36.8]). This was especially evident in the subgroup of successful recanalization (PBV-deficit: 87.5 mL [10.6; 115.1], final infarct: 8.7 mL [3.6; 29]). In futile recanalization, the final infarct tended to be underestimated (PBV-deficit: 86.4 mL [5.9; -] and final infarct: 116.4 mL [3.5; -]). Conclusions- Flat panel detector CT-PBV is not reliable in predicting the final infarct volume and should not be used in clinical decision making for endovascular treatment of acute cerebral artery occlusions.

28 keywords...

hide…