• W N Bernhard, L M Schalick, P A Delaney, T M Bernhard, and G M Barnas.
• Division of Anesthesiology, Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, USA.
• Aviat Space Envir Md. 1998 Sep 1; 69 (9): 883-6.

MethodsIn a double-blind study, we compared the efficacy of a combination of sustained-release acetazolamide and low-dose dexamethasone and acetazolamide alone for prophylaxis against acute mountain sickness (AMS) caused by rapid ascent to high altitude. Before ascent, 13 subjects were randomly assigned to receive a combination of one sustained-release acetazolamide capsule (500 mg) in the afternoon and 4 mg dexamethasone every 12 h, or a combination of the same dose of acetazolamide once daily and a placebo every 12 h. Days 1 and 2 were spent at 3698 m (La Paz, Bolivia), while days 3 and 4 were spent at 5334 m (Mount Chaclataya, Bolivia). Ascent was by 2 h motor vehicle ride. Heart rates, peripheral oxygen saturations and a modified score derived from the Environmental Symptom Questionnaire (modified-ESQ) were measured on each day. In addition, weighted averages of the cerebral (AMS-C) and respiratory (AMS-R) symptoms were calculated for days 3 and 4.ResultsHeart rate and modified-ESQ scores increased on days 3 and 4 compared with the other days in the acetazolamide/placebo group only (p < 0.05). Oxygen saturations decreased in both groups on days 3 and 4 (p < 0.05), but the decrease was greater in the acetazolamide/placebo group (p < 0.05). AMS-C and AMS-R scores rose above the suggested thresholds for indication of AMS on days 3 and 4 in the acetazolamide/placebo group only (p < 0.05).ConclusionWe conclude that this combination of sustained-release acetazolamide once daily and low-dose dexamethasone twice daily is more effective in ameliorating the symptoms of AMS than azetazolamide alone at the ascent that was studied.

26 keywords...

hide…