• World Neurosurg · Jul 2012

    Craniofacial resection of midline anterior skull base malignancies: a reassessment of outcomes in the modern era.

    • Shaan M Raza, Tomas Garzon-Muvdi, Gary L Gallia, and Rafael J Tamargo.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
    • World Neurosurg. 2012 Jul 1;78(1-2):128-36.

    ObjectiveCraniofacial resection has been considered the gold standard in the management of malignancies involving the anterior skull base, where the goal of surgery is negative margins with minimal morbidity. In recent years, there has been growing enthusiasm for purely endoscopic techniques for craniofacial malignancies. Given recent advancements in open surgical approaches, there is a need to review the technique of open craniofacial resection in the modern surgical era.MethodsWe review our experience of open craniofacial resection of midline anterior cranial fossa malignancies in the modern era.ResultsBetween 1995 and 2009, 41 patients underwent bifrontal craniotomy/craniofacial resection for malignancy. A subset of patients had undergone previous treatment, i.e., transfacial resection (34%), chemotherapy (5%), and radiation therapy (10%). Esthesioneuroblastoma (29%) was the most common pathology, followed by squamous cell carcinoma (27%) and the remaining patients presented with various histologic subtypes. All tumors invaded the cribriform plate; tumors invaded dura in 51%, parenchyma in 17% and orbit in 54% of patients. Negative margins were obtained in 85% of the cohort. Postoperative complications included seizure (one patient), cerebrospinal leak (one patient), and symptomatic pneumocephalus (two patients).ConclusionSince its introduction more than 50 years ago, craniofacial resection has undergone several important technical advancements concurrent to the introduction of endoscopy. With these improvements, our results indicate good oncologic disease control with minimal morbidity for extensive malignancies invading the intracranial cavity. With improvements in both open and endoscopic techniques, there is a need to reassess outcomes to determine relative indications.Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.