• Rossana Romani, Ahmed Elsharkawy, Aki Laakso, Marko Kangasniemi, and Juha Hernesniemi.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. rossana.romani@hus.fi
• World Neurosurg. 2012 May 1;77(5-6):698-703.

ObjectiveWe reviewed the surgical complications from our recent experience in vascular and tumor patients who underwent anterior clinoidectomy through the lateral supraorbital (LSO) approach.MethodsBetween June 2007 and January 2011, a total of 82 patients with neoplastic and vascular lesions underwent anterior clinoidectomy by the senior author (J.H.) through the LSO approach. We analyzed the operative videos paying particular attention to the surgical technique used for removal of the anterior clinoid process (ACP) and compared the microsurgical nuances to postoperative complications related to anterior clinoidectomy.ResultsForty-five patients were treated for aneurysms; 35 patients for intraorbital, parasellar, and suprasellar tumors; and 2 patients for carotid-cavernous fistulas. Intradural anterior clinoidectomy was performed in 67 (82%) cases; in 15 (18%) cases an extradural approach was used. In 51 (62%) cases, ACP was removed completely, whereas in the remaining 31 (38%) a tailored anterior clinoidectomy was performed. Four (5%) patients had new postoperative visual deficits and 3 (4%) experienced a worsening of preoperative visual deficits. Twelve (15%) patients improved their preoperative visual deficits after intradural anterior clinoidectomy. Ultrasonic bone device is a useful tool but may damage the optic nerve when performing anterior clinoidectomy. There was no mortality in our series.ConclusionAnterior clinoidectomy can be performed through an LSO approach with a safety profile that is comparable to other approaches. Ultrasonic bone dissector is a useful tool but may lead to injury of the optic nerve and should be used very carefully in its vicinity.Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.

39 keywords...

hide…