• Autoimmunity reviews · Feb 2019

    Meta Analysis

    Treatment of idiopathic inflammatory myositis associated interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    • Thomas Barba, Romain Fort, Vincent Cottin, Steeve Provencher, Isabelle Durieu, Sabine Jardel, Arnaud Hot, Quitterie Reynaud, and Jean-Christophe Lega.
    • Department of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite F-69310, France; Univ Lyon, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, France.
    • Autoimmun Rev. 2019 Feb 1; 18 (2): 113-122.

    ObjectiveInterstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most severe complication of idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM), resulting in significant increase in morbidity and mortality and for which the best treatment remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of therapies used for the management of IIM-related ILD.MethodsStudies were selected from MEDLINE up to July 2017. Two investigators independently extracted data on study design, patient characteristics, clinical features, treatment, follow-up and outcomes. Global survival rates and objectively confirmed lung function improvements were extracted as the main outcome for rapidly progressive IIM-related ILD (RP-ILD) and chronic forms of ILD (C-ILD), respectively, and pooled using the weighted mean proportion with fixed or random-effects models in case of significant heterogeneity (I2 > 50%).ResultsTwenty-seven studies encompassing 553 patients (male: 30.5%, age: 53.5 ± 5.5 years) were included in the meta-analysis. Globally, retrieved studies were of limited methodological quality (no controlled studies and only 2 prospective studies). Dermatomyositis (40%) and anti-tRNA synthetase syndrome (45%) were the most represented IIM subtypes. In C-ILD, functional improvement rates were 89.2% (95%CI 82.5-93.6; 7 studies, n = 124) for corticosteroids alone, 80.7% (95%CI 49.6-94; 6 studies, n = 38) for cyclosporine A, 64.1% (95%CI 46.3-78.7; 4 studies, n = 32) for azathioprine, 86.2% (95%CI 61.5-96; 2 studies, n = 23) for tacrolimus, 56.4% (95%CI 44-68.0; 8 studies, n = 71) for cyclophosphamide, and 76.6% (95%CI 50.4-96.0; 2 studies, n = 20) for rituximab. In RP-ILD, survival rates at 3 months were 51.7% (95%CI 24.2-78.1; 2 studies, n = 11) for corticosteroids alone, 69.2% (95%CI 55.0-80.5; 8 studies, n = 146) for cyclosporine A and 72.4% (95%CI 6.4-99.0, 2 studies, n = 16) for cyclophosphamide.ConclusionDespite aggressive immunosuppressive therapies, the short-term mortality of RP-ILD remains high. While immunosuppressive therapies are associated with significant functional improvements in most patients with C-ILD, substantial uncertainty remains about the best treatment strategy in the absence of good quality evidence.Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…