• Anand D Shah, Adarsh U Patel, Andrea Knezevic, Michael H Hoskins, David S Hirsh, Faisal M Merchant, Mikhael F El Chami, David B Delurgio, Anshul M Patel, Angel R Leon, Jonathan J Langberg, and Michael S Lloyd.
• Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
• Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 May 1; 40 (5): 467-475.

ObjectivesThis study compared risks associated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with non-MRI conditional and MRI conditional pacing and defibrillator systems with particular attention to clinically actionable outcomes.BackgroundWhile recipients of new MRI conditional pacemaker and defibrillator systems may undergo MRI scanning with very low risk, safety and regulatory concerns persist regarding such scanning in recipients of non-MRI conditional systems.MethodsPatients with any cardiac device who were referred for MRI were prospectively enrolled at a single center and underwent scanning at 1.5 Tesla. Pre- and postscan lead characteristic changes, system integrity, and symptoms were analyzed. A comparison was made between non-MRI conditional and MRI conditional devices.Results105 patients were evaluated allowing for comparison of 97 scans with non-MRI conditional devices and 16 scans with MRI conditional devices. The cohort included those with pacemaker dependency, defibrillator, and cardiac resynchronization devices. Small, nonsignificant changes were observed in lead characteristics following scanning, and there was no significant difference when comparing non-MRI and MRI conditional devices. Lead parameter changes did not require lead revision or programming changes. No device reset, failures, or premature scan termination was observed.Conclusions1.5 T MRI scanning in patients with MRI conditional and non-MRI conditional cardiac devices was performed with similar, low clinical risk.© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

29 keywords...

hide…