• N H Welsh.
• Department of Ophthalmology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
• S. Afr. Med. J. 1992 Apr 4; 81 (7): 357-60.

AbstractCataracts are the commonest cause of blindness in Third-World countries and cataract extraction is the commonest eye operation performed anywhere. Patients require optical correction after surgery either in the form of an intra-ocular lens (IOL) or bifocal aphakic glasses. The standard operative procedure in First-World countries is an extracapsular cataract extraction with an IOL. This type of operation has been thought to be contraindicated in black patients because of the complications and lack of adequate postoperative follow-up. During 1987-1989 3,144 cataract extractions, of which 2,157 were simple extracapsular extractions and 987 had IOLs inserted, were performed at the above hospitals. The two groups were compared for complications and visual results. The complications were similar in both groups and were acceptable, therefore posterior lens implantation confers no additional risk on routine extracapsular cataract extraction. The visual results in the IOL group with and without additional glasses were compared with those patients who had correcting aphakic glasses. In the corrected IOL group, 98% of patients saw better than 6/24, whereas in the aphakic spectacle group, 87.5% saw 6/24 or better. Since the majority of black patients cannot afford costly prescribed spectacles, it was important to analyse the visual acuity in patients who had IOLs and were uncorrected; 81.6% saw 6/24 or better. IOLs in black patients are therefore indicated but the disadvantage is the cost.

16 keywords...

hide…