• J Gen Intern Med · Nov 1991

    Comparative Study

    Alumni perspectives comparing a general internal medicine program and a traditional medicine program.

    • D P Kiel, P S O'Sullivan, P J Ellis, and S A Wartman.
    • Division of General Internal Medicine, Brown University Program in Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island.
    • J Gen Intern Med. 1991 Nov 1; 6 (6): 544-52.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate a primary care internal medicine curriculum, the authors surveyed four years (1983-1986) of graduates of the primary care and traditional internal medicine residency programs at their institution concerning the graduates' preparation.DesignMailed survey of alumni of a residency training program.SettingTeaching hospital alumni.Subjects/MethodsOf 91 alumni of an internal medicine training program for whom addresses had been found, 82 (90%) of the residents (20 primary care and 62 traditional) rated on a five-point Likert scale 82 items for both adequacy of preparation for practice and importance of training. These items were divided into five groups: traditional medical disciplines (e.g., cardiology), allied disciplines (e.g., orthopedics), areas related to medical practice (e.g., patient education), basic skills and knowledge (e.g., history and physical), and technical procedures.Main ResultsPrimary care residents were more likely to see themselves as primary care physicians versus subspecialists (84% versus 45%). The primary care graduates felt significantly better prepared in the allied disciplines and in areas related to medical practice (p less than 0.01). There was no significant difference overall in perceptions of preparation in the traditional medical disciplines, basic skills and knowledge, and procedures. The same results were obtained when the authors looked only at graduates from the two programs who spent more than 50% of their time as primary care physicians versus subspecialists. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the perceived importance of these areas to current practice.ConclusionsThese results suggest that the primary care curriculum has prepared residents in areas particularly relevant to primary care practice. Additionally, these individuals feel as well prepared as do their colleagues in the traditional medical disciplines, basic skills and knowledge, and procedural skills.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.