• Ann. Thorac. Surg. · Apr 1995

    Comparative Study

    Functional recovery after ischemia: warm versus cold cardioplegia.

    • J R Van Camp, L A Brunsting, K F Childs, and S F Bolling.
    • Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
    • Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1995 Apr 1; 59 (4): 795-802; discussion 802-3.

    AbstractWarm continuous retrograde cardioplegia has been introduced for myocardial protection during cardiac operations, particularly in the setting of acute myocardial ischemia because of its theoretical advantage of producing arrest without ischemia. To investigate the ability of warm continuous retrograde cardioplegia to provide myocardial protection after acute global ischemia, versus the more commonly used cold intermittent antegrade cardioplegia, 12 dogs were subjected to 15 minutes of normothermic global myocardial ischemia on cardiopulmonary bypass followed by 75 minutes of protected cardioplegic arrest using either warm continuous retrograde cardioplegia or cold intermittent antegrade cardioplegia. Standard blood cardioplegia at clinically used volumes and flow rates was used. Warm continuous retrograde cardioplegia animals received 30 mL/kg antegrade to induce arrest followed by 1.5 to 1.8 mL.kg-1.min-1 retrograde at 37 degrees C, whereas cold intermittent antegrade cardioplegia animals received 30 mL/kg antegrade to induce arrest followed by 15 mL/kg antegrade every 15 minutes at 10 degrees C. Load-insensitive left ventricular systolic function, diastolic function, high energy nucleotides, and edema formation were assessed before and after ischemia. Results showed that myocardial preservation using clinically reported flow rates and volumes of warm continuous retrograde cardioplegia was significantly inferior to that provided by clinically used cold intermittent antegrade cardioplegia, as demonstrated by decreased preload recruitable stroke work slope (28 +/- 11 versus 71 +/- 6), increased alpha constant of the end diastolic stress-strain relationship (14.2 +/- 3.0 versus 3.6 +/- 1.0), decreased total nondiffusable nucleotides (40.7 +/- 2.3 versus 57.4 +/- 2.3 microM/g wet weight) and increased water content (82.2% +/- 0.4% versus 80.4% +/- 0.4%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.