• Ann. Thorac. Surg. · Dec 1999

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of left and right atrial epicardial pacing in patients with congenital heart disease.

    • V Ramesh, J W Gaynor, M J Shah, T S Wieand, T L Spray, V L Vetter, and L A Rhodes.
    • Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
    • Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1999 Dec 1; 68 (6): 2314-9.

    BackgroundComplex congenital heart disease (CHD) often necessitates the use of epicardial pacing. Adequate right atrial (RA) sensing and pacing thresholds are often difficult to obtain due to suture line scarring and RA dilatation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the placement of left atrial (LA) epicardial leads in children.MethodsPatient demographics, pacing, and sensing data of atrial pacing systems implanted between January 1994 and January 1997 were collected.ResultsForty-nine pacing systems were implanted: 14 LA epicardial, 19 RA epicardial, and 16 transvenous in the right atrium. Lead impedance, current, and energy were similar in the two epicardial groups throughout the study. Energy thresholds (ET) were lower in the LA than RA at 6 months, and 1 and 2 years (p < 0.05). Analysis of post-Fontan patients performed alone revealed a lower ET in the LA as compared with the RA. Pacing and sensing parameters from transvenous leads are presented for relative comparison.ConclusionsTransvenous leads are most efficient but often contraindicated in complex CHD. LA leads offer lower energy thresholds than RA leads with similar sensing parameters.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…