• D A M Sloothaak, M W van den Berg, M G W Dijkgraaf, P Fockens, P J Tanis, J E van Hooft, W A Bemelman, and collaborative Dutch Stent-In study group.
• Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
• Br J Surg. 2014 Dec 1; 101 (13): 1751-7.

BackgroundThe Stent-In 2 trial randomized patients with malignant colonic obstruction to emergency surgery or stent placement as a bridge to elective surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the oncological outcomes.MethodsDisease recurrence, and disease-free, disease-specific and overall survival were evaluated, including a subgroup analysis of patients with a stent- or guidewire-related perforation.ResultsOf 98 patients included in the original Stent-In 2 trial, patients with benign (16) or incurable (23) disease were excluded from this study, along with a patient who had withdrawn from the trial. Of the remaining 58 patients, 32 were randomized to emergency surgery (31 resection, 1 stoma only) and 26 to stenting. Unsuccessful stenting required emergency surgery in six patients owing to wire or stent perforation. Locoregional or distant disease recurrence developed in nine of 32 patients in the emergency surgery group and 13 of 26 in the stent group. Disease-free survival was worse in the subgroup with stent- or guidewire-related perforation. Five of six patients in this subgroup developed a recurrence, compared with nine of 32 in the emergency surgery group and eight of 20 who had unperforated stenting.ConclusionStent placement for malignant colonic obstruction was associated with a risk of recurrence in this trial, but the numbers are small. There is not enough evidence to refute the approach strongly.Registration NumberISRCTN46462267 ( http://www.controlled-trials.com).© 2014 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

19 keywords...

hide…