• Clare L Cutland, Marianne Cunnington, Morounfolu Olugbosi, Stephanie A Jones, Andrea Hugo, Karishma Maharaj, Karen Slobod, and Shabir A Madhi.
• Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science and Technology National Research Foundation, Vaccine Preventable Diseases, South Africa; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Electronic address: cutlandc@rmpru.co.za.
• Vaccine. 2015 Nov 25; 33 (47): 6406-12.

IntroductionInfectious causes are a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality in neonates and young infants. Immunization of pregnant women to protect the mother and/or her infant is gaining momentum due to the benefits of this strategy demonstrated in numerous implemented strategies (Maternal and Neonatal Tetanus Elimination Initiative) and clinical trials. Reluctance by regulators, participants and healthcare providers to include pregnant women in clinical trials is considerable, but reducing. Infectious disease burden, and therefore need for interventions to reduce morbidity and mortality in mothers and infants, is highest in low-middle income countries (LMIC), however, reliable background data on adverse pregnancy outcomes and lack of experience in clinical trials and community opinions on immunization during pregnancy are not well documented.MethodsWe used our experiences in conducting two clinical studies in pregnant women in South Africa to illustrate the challenges experienced and lessons learnt which may benefit others working in the maternal immunization field.ResultsAccurate gestational age assessment, which is essential for clinical trials, is challenging in LMIC due to limited access to early ultrasound examinations, and unreliable assessment by history (last menstrual period date) and physical examination (symphyseal-fundal height). Concomitant administration of recommended vaccines has previously been avoided in clinical trials; however, this limitation could impact the potentially beneficial interventions that participants can access during antenatal care. Women in LMIC have a higher burden of concomitant illnesses (e.g. HIV infection, malaria and anaemia) and adverse pregnancy outcomes (e.g. stillbirth) than pregnant women in higher income countries. Availability of local data is essential for safety monitoring committees to identify vaccine-related adverse event triggers.ConclusionImmunization of pregnant women to reduce disease burden in them and their infants is promising, and women in high-risk settings should be included in trials (Clinical trial registry number: 'Study A': NCT01193920, 'Study B': NCT01888471).Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

22 keywords...

hide…