• Maximilian J Johnston, Sonal Arora, Philip H Pucher, Yannis Reissis, Louise Hull, Jeremy R Huddy, Dominic King, and Ara Darzi.
• *Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, London, UK †Department of Surgery and Cancer, London, UK ‡School of Medicine, London, UK §Centre for Health Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK.
• Ann. Surg. 2016 Mar 1; 263 (3): 477-86.

ObjectiveTo develop and provide validity and feasibility evidence for the QUality of Information Transfer (QUIT) tool.BackgroundPrompt escalation of care in the setting of patient deterioration can prevent further harm. Escalation and information transfer skills are not currently measured in surgery.MethodsThis study comprised 3 phases: the development (phase 1), validation (phase 2), and feasibility analysis (phase 3) of the QUIT tool. Phase 1 involved identification of core skills needed for successful escalation of care through literature review and 33 semistructured interviews with stakeholders. Phase 2 involved the generation of validity evidence for the tool using a simulated setting. Thirty surgeons assessed a deteriorating postoperative patient in a simulated ward and escalated their care to a senior colleague. The face and content validity were assessed using a survey. Construct and concurrent validity of the tool were determined by comparing performance scores using the QUIT tool with those measured using the Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (SBAR) tool. Phase 3 was conducted using direct observation of escalation scenarios on surgical wards in 2 hospitals.ResultsA 7-category assessment tool was developed from phase 1 consisting of 24 items. Twenty-one of 24 items had excellent content validity (content validity index >0.8). All 7 categories and 18 of 24 (P < 0.05) items demonstrated construct validity. The correlation between the QUIT and SBAR tools used was strong indicating concurrent validity (r = 0.694, P < 0.001). Real-time scoring of escalation referrals was feasible and indicated that doctors currently have better information transfer skills than nurses when faced with a deteriorating patient.ConclusionsA validated tool to assess information transfer for deteriorating surgical patients was developed and tested using simulation and real-time clinical scenarios. It may improve the quality and safety of patient care on the surgical ward.

16 keywords...

hide…