• Ophthalmology · Jan 2004

    Comparative Study

    What is lost by digitizing stereoscopic fundus color slides for macular grading in age-related maculopathy and degeneration?

    • Hendrik P N Scholl, Samantha S Dandekar, Tunde Peto, Catey Bunce, Wen Xing, Sharon Jenkins, and Alan C Bird.
    • Institute of Ophthalmology and Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom. hendrikscholl@hotmail.com
    • Ophthalmology. 2004 Jan 1; 111 (1): 125-32.

    ObjectiveTo compare 35-mm stereoscopic slide transparencies with digitized nonstereoscopic images (resolution 1024x768 pixels) for grading abnormalities in age-related maculopathy (ARM) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD).DesignComparative observational case series.ParticipantsTwenty-five patients (50 eyes) with ARM and/or AMD.MethodsTwenty-five patients with ARM/AMD in at least 1 eye were randomly selected from a large ongoing collection of clinical data and DNA in a tertiary referral United Kingdom population. Retinal photography was performed with mydriasis using the Zeiss FF-series 30 degrees fundus camera on Ektachrome slide transparency film. The images were centered on the macula. The color transparencies were then digitized. The grading process has been set up based on the International ARM Epidemiology Study Group. All images were independently graded by 3 retinal specialists. Both kappa statistics and exact agreement were calculated to assess agreement between and within observers and between the 2 master copies derived from the gradings of the color slides and digitized images.Main Outcome MeasureAgreement between the 2 master copies derived from the gradings obtained from stereoscopic slide transparencies and digitized nonstereoscopic images.ResultsFor small hard and intermediate soft drusen, agreement ranged between 77% and 91% (kappa, 0.56-0.72) and 83% and 93% (kappa, 0.31-0.64), respectively, for the 3 macular subfields. Agreement for the presence of hyperpigmentation was 12% to 56% (kappa, 0.00-0.27). Agreement was 94% to 96% (kappa, 0.80-0.82) for the presence of geographic atrophy and 93% (kappa, 0.78) for the area covered. For the presence of choroidal neovascularization (CNV), agreement was 94% to 98% (kappa, 0.81-0.88), and it was 95% (kappa, 0.83) for the area covered. For individual features of CNV, exact agreement was 88% to 96% (kappa, 0.22-0.49). In 3 cases of geographic atrophy and 2 cases of CNV, the lesion was missed on digitized images.ConclusionsBecause of the close agreement for most categories between the grading of stereoscopic color slides and digitized images, digitized nonstereoscopic color images prove to be useful for grading ARM and AMD.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…