• J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. · Aug 1993

    Diagnostic value of chest radiography for pericardial effusion.

    • M J Eisenberg, M M Dunn, N Kanth, G Gamsu, and N B Schiller.
    • Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco.
    • J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1993 Aug 1; 22 (2): 588-93.

    ObjectivesThis study was designed to determine the diagnostic value of chest radiography for pericardial effusion.BackgroundPericardial effusions may cause life-threatening cardiac complications, yet they are often difficult to diagnose.MethodsIn a blinded manner, we reviewed the chest radiographs of 83 patients with echocardiographically diagnosed pericardial effusions (5 large, 18 moderate, 60 small) and those of 17 control subjects without effusions. We examined four radiographic signs: an enlarged cardiac silhouette, a pericardial fat stripe, a predominant left-sided pleural effusion and an increase in transverse cardiac diameter compared with the diameter on a previous chest radiograph.ResultsAn enlarged cardiac silhouette was moderately sensitive (71%) but not specific (41%) for pericardial effusion. A pericardial fat stripe, a predominant left-sided pleural effusion and an increase in transverse cardiac diameter were all specific (94%, 100% and 80%, respectively) but not sensitive (12%, 20% and 46%, respectively). A predominant left-sided pleural effusion was associated with pericardial effusions of all sizes (odds ratio = 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-1.6, p = 0.04) and with large and moderate pericardial effusions alone (odds ratio = 7.7, 95% CI = 2.5-24.0, p = 0.0004). In contrast, a pericardial fat stripe was associated only with large and moderate pericardial effusions (odds ratio = 3.3, 95% CI = 0.9-12.0, p = 0.07), and an enlarged cardiac silhouette and an increase in cardiac diameter were not associated with pericardial effusion at all.ConclusionsA predominant left-sided pleural effusion and a pericardial fat stripe are chest radiographic signs that are suggestive, but not diagnostic, of pericardial effusion. Because these signs cannot reliably confirm or exclude the presence of pericardial effusion, we conclude that chest radiography is poorly diagnostic of this condition.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.